Rush Limbaugh and the acceptance of low-level racism against Asian Americans
If you haven’t noticed, in one week the anti-Asian/Asian American meter was off
the charts and maxing out in the red.
But it’s likely that you, like everyone else, probably didn’t even notice.
Asian American cultural slights? Are you kidding? Who takes those seriously as
civil rights violations?
Maybe you should. Unfortunately, these are times when everyday racist fare tends
to go unchecked, thereby becoming the acceptable “norm.”
Add to that, the news of Philadelphia Eagle player Riley Cooper saying the “N”
word in public, and you know any transgressions about Asian Americans will
barely register a blip on society’s racial radar.
Yet, last week was practically high tide for anti-Asian sentiment in the media.
Not since the Asiana Ho Lee Fuk episode have we seen so many offensive instances
come at us at once. Let me count the ways:
A pop band called Day Above Ground put out a racist and sexist music video on YouTube called “Asian Girlz.” After gaining attention, the band took down the video and refused to apologize.
Fox started pushing a new Seth MacFarlane sitcom, “Dads,” that, among other things, features a self-hating, denigrating Asian American female character played by Brenda Song. Song dresses up inappropriately and has a high pitched giggle like a female anime character. It’s a character who will do anything to get ahead. She’s no Mulan.
A number of off-handed remarks, including one by a CNBC reporter describing Murdoch spouse Wendi Deng’s divorce tactics (see my CHITA blog post).
Another comment, this time about Jennifer Lee, a Washington, D.C. area Asian American doctor seen in a photo on the popular website FishbowlDC. The offensive comments came from editor Betsy Rothstein, who added to Lee’s photo the comment, “Mi so horny” (sic). (I don’t think Rothstein was horny for Lee, but rather mocked Lee’s Asian-ness with the cliched joke. Rothstein used the spelling “mi,” which is strange because that’s Spanish and not English. Maybe she had a pupusa the night before in Adams Morgan).
On the list, the Rothstein comment gets my vote for most objectionable because
it’s not some major effort like a record, or TV show, or a cable newscast.
Surely, those people should know better and be held accountable. But the
Rothstein remark is more insidious because it’s typical of the kind of breezy
way some people try to pass off a vile comment as a harmless, benign every day
Rothstein even prefaced the column by saying there would be no apology
forthcoming. (Indeed, there hasn’t been, though the offensive phrase has been
Still, take all of these episodes in aggregate and it’s more than a mild
annoyance–it’s death by a thousand cuts.
And Asian Americans let them get away with it.
If there’s some hope from last week, it comes in a small news tidbit that Rush
Limbaugh and his illegitimate radio love child, Sean Hannity, might lose their
(including its New York City flagship) owned by Cumulus.
If you want to get the cultural history correct, the green light for all the
hate and “acceptable” racism we hear and see in the media and society in general
was first signaled when a DJ named Limbaugh stopped playing records and started
spewing his conservative rants Top 40 style.
In the mid-to-late ’80s, America was coming out of Reagan and the disco era.
Selfishness and greed were virtues. But when the country was hit by a nasty
recession in 1989, people became vulnerable to Limbaugh’s message. It was the
rhetoric that under the guise of satire blamed society’s ills on such things as
“welfare queens,” “illegal immigrants,” and people of color.
Syndicated to hundreds of stations throughout the country, Limbaugh became the
enabler of this coarse discourse. And as the views were broadcast unbalanced and
unchecked, they were deemed acceptable.
At the same time, Limbaugh got rich spewing toxic rhetoric on the public
airwaves–no different from any corporate giant that turned your local river into
a Superfund site.
His popularity also helped drive a political shift that culminated in the GOP
takeover in the House, the so-called Gingrich “Contract with America” in the
1994 midterm elections.
We’ve had nearly a generation of this kind of uncivil, in-your-face rhetoric
that has contributed to the notion that ideas and facts are less important than
attitude and snark.
It’s even fueled the rise of the Tea Party and provided a blueprint for pols
like Texas Senator Ted Cruz.
I’d like to think that if Limbaugh loses his biggest contracts, it may signal
that a change in tone is near. Maybe Limbaugh will retire with his OxyContin and
But we may all be too far into this already to see much of a reversal from what
has become the norm.
After this week, there seems to be such a bull run on anti-Asian/Asian American
snark that it doesn’t seem like any change will come soon enough.
Unless we start caring in a loud, vocal, and active way, the perps won’t either.
And the hits will just keep on coming.
Emil Guillermo is an independent journalist/commentator. Updates at www.amok.com. Follow Emil on Twitter, and like his Facebook page. The views expressed in his blog do not necessarily represent AALDEF’s views or policies.