On the Trans-Pacific surveillance of Filipino writer Carlos Bulosan
These days, in the internet era when Bush’s NSA policies continue under Obama, it must be presumed that everyone is under some kind of surveillance.
Even innocent Asian Americans.
And given the global nature of things, it would take a real leap of faith to believe foreign governments of our ancestral countries of origin are not interested in what some of us are doing as well.
Paranoia? We live in that kind of world.
It didn’t used to be that way.
Ah, the good old days, when the FBI would only hound innocent people like artists, writers, and activists thought to be Communist Party members.
And that brings us to the subject of today’s American Filipino History Month Lesson, the writer Carlos Bulosan.
Among Filipino immigrants to America in the 1920s, Carlos Bulosan stands as the community’s literary lion. His semi-autobiographical novel, “America is in the Heart,” (1946) endures as the seminal story of the American Filipino migrant labor experience during the Depression.
In that novel, Bulosan wrote: “I came to know that in many ways it was a crime to be Filipino in California…I feel like a criminal running away from a crime I did not commit. And this crime is that I am a Filipino in America.”
It wasn’t just his imagination.
Despite mainstream success, including publication in the Saturday Evening Post, from 1946 to 1956, Bulosan was hurt by accusations that he was a member of the Communist Party.
In 2002, I wrote about two Asian American scholars, Lane Hirabayashi and Marilyn Alquizola, who used the Freedom of Information Act to seek the truth about how the FBI targeted Bulosan.
Last year, the scholars wrote about the FBI files they obtained that showed the bureau had its eye on Bulosan between 1946 and 1956.
The FBI ultimately determined Bulosan was not a member of the Communist Party.
But it didn’t change what the surveillance had done to Bulosan, who found himself essentially “blacklisted” and unemployable, unable to make a living as a writer. The surveillance coincided with Bulosan’s heavy drinking and ill health. He died on Sept. 11, 1956.
Recently, Hirabayashi and Alquizola found it wasn’t just the U.S. interested in Bulosan’s activities. The Philippine government also wanted to know the writer’s links to the Huks, Communist rebels who fought for land reform in the Philippines.
That fact was first revealed by Professor Augusto Espiritu’s “Five Faces of Exile: The Nation and the Filipino American Intellectuals,” (Stanford University Press, 2005) from research in the Bulosan archive at the University of Washington.
However, Hirabayashi and Alquizola found the actual newspaper article in the Manila Chronicle, dated January, 30, 1951, that shows U.S. military intelligence was somehow involved in working with the Philippine government.
“Link Between PI, US Commies Bared,” blares the front page headline.
Army investigators said they had found letters from Bulosan to members of the Huks. And it cites how the Philippines Military Intelligence Service was working with the “intelligence service of the U.S. Army.”
But according to the newspaper, the only letter signed by Bulosan was written to one of the Huk leaders and reads: “I like to extend my congratulations to you through Amado, whose presence in America cemented the progressive spirit of peoples on this continent and in that island, with the fond hope that I will be able to put all our efforts into a big book for the world.”
It’s exactly what Bulosan did in his last novel, “The Cry and the Dedication.”
But membership in the CP or the Huks?
Alquizola said it only shows Bulosan’s research technique for an eventual book, not his membership in any group that would require his surveillance.
Remember, the FBI ultimately concluded that Bulosan was not a CP member.
Alquizola and Hirabayashi will be among the scholars presenting at a Bulosan conference at the University of Washington on Nov. 14. (It’s his birth month, though there’s some dispute on the exact day and year. Some say Bulosan was born 1914, making this Bulosan’s Centennial year.)
Scholars who love Bulosan care about all this because it’s clear: the unnecessary government scrutiny from two governments curtailed the life and art of an innocent man who is considered an American Filipino treasure.
All the rest of us who love our freedoms should care because what was done to Bulosan can happen to any of us today–more easily and more efficiently—than ever.